Work stopped at WTO, know how it will affect India.
The World Trade
Organization (WTO), with 164 member countries, which has been operating and
monitoring the world's trade rules for nearly 25 years, is now just a name. It
cannot now hear a case after two of the three judges of its Appellate Body
(AB), which has given its final verdict on trade disputes, retire on December
10. Normally it consisted of 7 judges, but due to the appointment of judges
from the US and the budget constraints, this number had come down to the
minimum quorum of 3, which has now been neutralized with 1 judge.
While the WTO is the
only democratic platform for complaints and hearings on the global platform for
developing economies like India, developed countries like the US have begun to
expect arbitrary decisions. The US did not approve the appointment of the
judges, saying that the appellate body has started taking decisions beyond its
jurisdiction.
Decisions in the WTO
take place at three levels. In the first phase, the plaintiff and the
respondent countries are given an opportunity for negotiation and mutual
consent. If this is not done, a panel is formed which gives the verdict. If its
decision is not valid, it can be appealed in the Appellate Body. Of the 592
trade disputes that have come to the WTO so far, 118 have ended by mutual
consent, while 137 have gone to appeal. India currently has 30 cases pending at
all levels in the WTO, of which it is a petitioner in 12 and a defendant in 18
cases. But of the total 14 appeals pending in AB, only two are from India.
Advantage or disadvantage
of india
The abolition of AB
may give India short-term relief, as the WTO panel ruled against India on 31
October 2019 on the US complaint against export subsidy schemes and ordered the
closure of schemes like MEIS within six months. Was. India has appealed against
this in AB and as long as it is stalled, it is not legally obliged to stop the
schemes. This is the reason that India is resuming several recently closed
export schemes on its behalf.
Failed to stop tariff war
India is also not too
worried about the abolition of the AB, because in recent years the WTO has
failed to stop the protectionism that started under the banner of 'America
First' and tariff-war with many countries including China. India itself has had
to pay a counter tariff to increase the US tariffs on many products including
Indian steel, aluminum.
WTO was opposed
Apart from this, the
way the developed countries had mobilized against India on agricultural
products and to stop farmers from economical electricity, water, fertilizer to
cheaper ration to the poor, so that India could become a big market for their
processed food. In such a situation, there was strong opposition to the WTO in
India. Not only the United States, Britain, New Zealand and Australia have
tightened the visa rules keeping the WTO rules in check to prevent Indian
students and professionals, which is a big challenge for India.
Benefits to developing countries
India has to compete
with neighboring countries, especially ASEAN, to increase its share in global
trade and many of these countries have free trade agreements with them. The
more FTAs, the less the need for WTO. Experts also believe that the WTO has
been a major contributor to the progress made in the global market for many
developing countries like India. India itself has been able to express its
views to veterans like America and China through this platform in about a dozen
major cases in the last two decades. It has also protected many of its
intellectual properties.
No comments:
Post a Comment